Preliminary results from phase 2 of CC-92480- MM- 001: Mezigdomide plus dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM)

In phase 1 of CC-92480- MM- 001 (NCT03374085), the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of mezigdomide plus dexamethasone (MEZI-d) was selected at 1 mg once daily for 21/28 days. Here we report preliminary results from the MEZI-d dose-expansion cohort in patients with heavily pretreated RRMM. Key eligibility criteria were: RRMM;>=3 prior lines of therapy;disease progression <=60 days of last myeloma therapy;refractoriness to lenalidomide/pomalidomide, a proteasome inhibitor, a glucocorticoid, and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody. Oral mezigdomide 1 mg was given on days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle, plus weekly dexamethasone (40 mg;20 mg if >75 years of age). Primary objective was to evaluate efficacy (overall response rate [ORR]);secondary objectives included safety/tolerability and additional efficacy assessments. Pharmacodynamics was an exploratory objective. As of 16/Sep/2022, 101 patients had received MEZI-d at the RP2D. Median age was 67 (range 42-85) years, median time since initial diagnosis was 7.4 (1.1-37.0) years;39.6% of patients had plasmacytomas and 37/101 patients had high-risk cytogenetics (56/101 not evaluable). Median number of prior regimens was 6 (3-15);prior therapies included stem cell transplantation (77.2%) and anti-BCMA therapy (29.7%). All patients were refractory to last myeloma regimen and triple-class refractory. Median follow-up was 7.5 (0.5-21.9) months, with a median of 4 (1-20) cycles;10.0% of patients continued treatment;progressive disease was the main reason for discontinuation (60.4%). ORR was 40.6% for all patients. Whilst data are not mature yet, median PFS was 4.4 (95% CI 3.0-5.5) months and median duration of response was 7.6 (95% CI 5.4-9.5) months. ORR was 30.0% in patients with plasmacytomas (N = 40) and 50.0% in patients with prior anti-BCMA therapy (N = 30). Ninety-one (91.1%) patients experienced a grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE). Most frequent hematologic grade 3/4 TEAEs were neutropenia (75.2%), anaemia (35.6%), and thrombocytopenia (27.7%);34.7% of patients had grade 3/4 infections, including grade 3/4 pneumonia (15.8%) and COVID-19 (7.0%). Occurrence of other grade 3/4 non-hematologic TEAEs was generally low. Due to TEAEs, 76.2% and 29.7% of patients had mezigdomide dose interruptions and reductions, respectively;90.1% of patients discontinued mezigdomide. Mezigdomide induced substrate degradation and increases in activated and proliferating T cells in patients, including those directly refractory to pomalidomide-based therapies. MEZI-d had a manageable safety profile with encouraging efficacy in patients with triple-class refractory RRMM, including patients with prior BCMA-targeted therapies. These results strongly support the continued development of mezigdomide in MM, and especially in combination.

Should COVID-19 pandemic mitigations in the myeloma clinic continue? A summary of patient opinions

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated multiple changes to the format of myeloma clinics to minimise the risk of infection among patients and staff. These included changing in-person clinic appointments to telephone appointments when there was no medical need for face-to- face review and instituting a courier service for delivery of oral or self-administered medications. As COVID-19 restrictions relaxed, we sought to investigate the acceptability of these changes to our patients and to determine which, if any, of the new arrangements should continue. Method(s): Patients who attended the Myeloma Clinic at The Royal Marsden Hospital, both in-person and by telephone, on four separate dates in August and September 2022 were asked to complete a questionnaire to provide their opinions using a combination of multiple-choice, Likert scale and free-text questions. These covered the main domains of change outlined above along with questions about blood test location and attendance with family and friends. Result(s): Questionnaires were returned by 59 patients, 11 relating to in-person appointments and 48 to telephone appointments. 86.0% of patients were in favour of continuing the option of telephone appointments, with many highlighting their convenience and the avoidance of long travel and waiting times, with some also mentioning their COVID-19 security. However, a number of patients expressed concerns including communication difficulties, the inability to effectively assess physical health with an examination and a lack of reassurance. Furthermore, those who attended in-person appointments felt they were very COVID-secure, assigning them a mean of score of 4.5, where 1 was very insecure and 5 very secure. Several suggested that the optimum schedule would include regular telephone appointments with occasional in-person meetings. Interestingly, only 25.5% of patients wanted a video calling option. Patients were also very positive about receiving medications by courier, with 94.1% of patients receiving their medications within two working days of their clinic appointment. 81.8% of patients expressed a wish for this option to continue, highlighting the increased convenience and reduction in waiting times. Conclusion(s): These results suggest that changes made to the Myeloma Clinic in response to the COVID-19 pandemic have improved the patient experience. A mixture of telephone and in-person appointments may be preferable for this cohort of patients, many of whom require regular appointments for chemotherapy approval but are medically stable, and whose frailty makes long travel and waiting times challenging. These findings have implications for the planning of myeloma clinics across the UK.

Fitness, a UK Myeloma Research Alliance (UK-MRA) Frailty-Adjusted Therapy Study, Supports the Feasibility of Recruiting Frail Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Patients to Large Clinical Trials

Background Although the median age of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) is 70-74 years, recruitment of frail older patients to clinical trials is poor. The International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) frailty score predicts survival, adverse events and treatment tolerability using age, the Katz Activity of Daily Living, the Lawton Instrumental Activity of Daily Living, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index, rather than age alone. Despite IMWG score prognostic biomarker capability, to date no evidence exists of its predictive biomarker potential. The UK-MRA Myeloma Risk Profile (MRP) has also been shown in both clinical trial and real-world populations to be a prognostic biomarker in transplant ineligible patients but prospective comparisons of the two scores have not been previously conducted. Study Design/Methods The FiTNEss trial (Myeloma XIV, NCT03720041, Figure 1A) is a UK-MRA phase III, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial for newly diagnosed MM patients not suitable for stem cell transplant. The primary objectives are 1) to compare early treatment cessation (<60 days from randomisation) between patients randomised to standard (reactive) and frailty-adjusted (adaptive, based on IMWG score) induction therapy delivery with the triplet ixazomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IRd) 2) to compare progression free survival for maintenance lenalidomide plus placebo (R) and lenalidomide plus ixazomib (IR). The FiTNEss trial is designed as an all-comers study with few exclusion criteria other than necessary for safety including some haematological and biochemical parameters, but there is no exclusion based on renal function. Patients with grade 2 or greater baseline peripheral neuropathy, current systemic infection or recent surgery or other cancer are excluded. Here we report the demographics for the first patients recruited, including IMWG frailty assessments and MRP to demonstrate the feasibility of recruiting frail patients to randomised phase III clinical trials. Results The FiTNEss trial opened on 04/08/2020 during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK. At the time of data cut off (14/07/2021) recruitment is active at 84 sites, with 180 patients randomised. Baseline characteristics for the randomised patients are shown in Figure 1B. The median age of patients is 77 years (range 64, 93) with 36.1% aged 76-80 and 26.1% over 80. In keeping with the older patient population 26.6% have an ECOG performance status of 2 or 3 and 31.7% ISS stage III. The IMWG frailty classification at baseline is FIT 43/180 (23.9%), UNFIT 53/180 (29.4%) and FRAIL 84/180 (46.7%). The effect of using age groups on the definition of patient frailty was explored. The IMWG frailty score defines all patients over 80 as FRAIL whilst an age of 76-80 contributes one point to the score. An analysis of patients' frailty was repeated with the contribution of age removed. For those aged over 80 years (n=47, 100% FRAIL) we found that 20 (42.6%) would have been re-classified as FIT and 18 (38.3%) as UNFIT, with only 9 (19.2%) retaining the FRAIL category. For those aged 76-80 (n=65, 53.8% UNFIT, 46.2% FRAIL) all 35 patients previously classified as UNFIT became FIT (53.8%) whilst 19 (29.2%) classed as FRAIL became UNFIT with 11 (16.9%) remaining FRAIL. The MRP classification, using age as a continuous variable, was Low-risk 45/180 (25.0%), Medium-risk 46/180 (25.6%), High-risk 75/180 (41.7%) and not available for 14/180 (7.8%) patients. Concordance between the IMWG frailty score and the MRP occurred in 48.9% of patients (88/180). 37.2% of FIT patients were classified as MRP Low-risk, 32.1% of UNFIT patients as MRP Medium-risk and 65.5% of FRAIL patients as MRP High-risk. Discussion The FiTNEss trial demonstrates the feasibility of recruiting older, less fit patients to clinical trials. Recruitment of patients classified as FRAIL was very high despite the COVID pandemic, likely due to the all-oral nature of the regimen under investigation enabling patients to avoid attendance at hospital day units for treatment and associa ed exposure risk. In the population recruited to date we found age to be a key contributor to the FRAIL category of the IMWG frailty score. Concordance between IMWG frailty score and MRP was highest in FRAIL/High-risk patients. The first interim analysis of the primary objectives is planned when 50% of required participants for R1 have reached 60 days post R1, which is anticipated in Q2 of 2022. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Cook: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria;Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria;Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria;Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria;Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Honoraria;Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Pawlyn: Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Celgene / BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Amgen: Honoraria. Royle: BMS: Research Funding;Merck Sharpe and Dohme: Research Funding;Amgen: Research Funding;Takeda: Research Funding. Coulson: BMS / Celgene: Honoraria;Merck Sharpe and Dohme: Research Funding;Amgen: Research Funding;Takeda: Research Funding. Jenner: BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau;Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau;Pfizer: Consultancy;Takeda: Consultancy. Kishore: Sanofi: Other: Attending fees;Celgene: Other: Attending fees;Takeda: Other: Attending fees;Jannsen: Other: Attending fees. Rabin: BMS / Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support for meetings;Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support for meetings;Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support for meetings. Best: BMS/Celgene: Research Funding;Merck Sharpe and Dohme: Research Funding;Amgen: Research Funding;Takeda: Research Funding. Gillson: BMS / Celgene: Research Funding;Meck Sharpe and Dohme: Research Funding;Amgen: Research Funding;Takeda: Research Funding. Henderson: Takeda: Research Funding;Amgen: Research Funding;Merck Sharpe and Dohme: Research Funding;BMS / Celgene: Research Funding. Olivier: Merck Sharpe and Dohme: Research Funding;Takeda: Research Funding;Amgen: Research Funding;Celgene / BMS: Research Funding. Kaiser: AbbVie: Consultancy;GSK: Consultancy;Karyopharm: Consultancy, Research Funding;Pfizer: Consultancy;Amgen: Honoraria;Seattle Genetics: Consultancy;Takeda: Consultancy, Other: Educational support;Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Educational support, Research Funding;BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding. Drayson: Abingdon Health: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Jones: Janssen: Honoraria;BMS/Celgene: Other: Conference fees. Cairns: Merck Sharpe and Dohme: Research Funding;Amgen: Research Funding;Takeda: Research Funding;Celgene / BMS: Other: travel support, Research Funding. Jackson: celgene BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau;amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau;takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau;GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau;J and J: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau;oncopeptides: Consultancy;Sanofi: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. OffLabel Disclosure: Frailty-score adapted dosing strategies